Comparing Machiavellis The Prince And The Catholic Church Video
Why Good People Make Bad Leaders - Machiavelli's 'The Prince' Comparing Machiavellis The Prince And The Catholic ChurchLorenzo di Piero de' Medici to whom the final version of The Prince was dedicated Machiavelli's best-known book Il Principe contains several maxims concerning politics.
Export Citation
Instead of the more traditional target audience of a hereditary prince, it concentrates on the possibility of a "new prince". To retain power, the hereditary prince must carefully balance the interests of a variety of institutions to which the people are accustomed. By contrast, a new prince has the more difficult task in ruling: He must first stabilise his newfound power in order to build an enduring political structure. Machiavelli suggests that the social benefits of stability and security can be achieved in the face of moral corruption.
Related Documents
Machiavelli believed that public and private morality had to be understood as two different things in order to rule well. Machiavelli believed as a ruler, it was better to be widely feared than to be greatly loved; A loved ruler retains authority by obligation while a feared leader rules by fear of punishment.
Force may be used to eliminate political rivals, to destroy resistant populations, and to purge the community of other men strong enough of a character to rule, who will inevitably attempt to replace the ruler. Humanists also viewed the book negatively, including Erasmus of Rotterdam. As a treatise, its primary intellectual contribution to the history of political thought is the fundamental break between political realism and political idealismdue to it being a manual on acquiring and keeping political power. In contrast with Plato and AristotleMachiavelli insisted that an imaginary ideal society is not a model by which a prince should orient himself.
Copy Citation
Concerning the differences and similarities in Machiavelli's advice to ruthless and tyrannical princes in The Prince and his more republican exhortations in Discourses on Livy, few assert that The Prince, although written as advice for a monarchical prince, contains arguments for the superiority of republican regimes, similar to those found in the Discourses. In the 18th century, the work was even called a satirefor example by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Discourses on Livy[ edit ] Main article: Discourses on Livy The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livius, written aroundpublished inoften referred to simply as the Discourses or Discorsi, is nominally a discussion regarding the classical history of early Ancient Romealthough it strays very far from this subject matter and also uses contemporary political examples to illustrate points.
Machiavelli presents it as a series of lessons on how a republic should be started and structured. It is a much larger work than The Prince, and while it more openly explains the advantages of republics, it also contains many similar themes from his other works.]
You have quickly thought up such matchless phrase?
Rather amusing message
This day, as if on purpose